- The Debate Daily
- Posts
- Should people learn maths until they are 18?
Should people learn maths until they are 18?
New England Manager⚽️ | US Warns Israel on Gaza Aid 🇺🇸 | UK Eyes Standard Charging Cable 🔌
Welcome to today’s issue of The Debate Daily!
In today’s email: Maths is one of the most practical and career-relevant skills. No matter what area of expertise or job, maths aids in critical thinking skills, scientific inquiry and dealing with everyday life. Yet there is some contention on whether maths needs to be obligatory for all students until the age of 18. Maths is essential, but prioritising maths could overshadow the benefits of other subjects in teaching the skills that math does already. In the debate today, we way to what extent the argument for compulsory highschool maths education is necessary.
By Gabby Miller
The Headlines
Thomas Tuchel, New England Manger
England Manager: Former Chelsea boss Thomas Tuchel has agreed to become the next England manager, making him the third non-British coach in the team's history.
US Warns Israel on Gaza Aid: The US has warned Israel to improve humanitarian aid access in Gaza within 30 days or risk a cut in military assistance, following a new Israeli offensive with high civilian casualties.
UK Charging Cables: The UK is considering requiring all new electronic devices to use a universal charging cable, with USB-C being a leading option, as part of a government review launched in October.
Debate #027
Should people learn maths until they are 18?
Many argue that teaching maths until the end of high school would allow broader education and career options, a more competitive economy, and transferable skills. With many high schoolers not knowing what they would like to do after school, math can be seen as a good assurance.
Careers and degrees - Many students are unaware of how many degrees and jobs require competence in maths. Almost all hard science subjects and even some social science ones necessitate some understanding of mathematical thinking and operations. Now that the information age is booming with automation, AI and the use of data, the prevalence of knowing maths is becoming more crucial. Thus, keeping maths education until 18 prepares all students to be ready for current and future careers.
Maths is more than just calculations
Competitiveness - The UK can be seen as out of step with other countries regarding the proportion of students studying maths and global rankings of mathematical abilities. Alongside the damaged state of government services and economic growth recently, building competitiveness through maths could be a future step in recovering Britain’s economic power. By implementing the study of maths until 18, England can become more competitive not only with other countries but also increase economic growth at home.
Teaches life skills - Maths is more than just calculations. It can be seen to improve cognitive functioning and logical thinking skills. In all aspects of life, humans need to reason and deduce solutions from analysing problems, both skills that maths offers great practice for students.
However…
While there is reason to teach maths until the age of 18, the skills learned are not exclusive to maths and are not as transferable to professional and personal aspects of students’ future lives. Additionally, issues with low national maths performance may be related to poor teaching rather than missing two years of education.
Skills learnt are not exclusive - Many cognitive benefits and skills learnt are not exclusive to Maths. Logical thinking can be taught through other sciences, and analysis skills can be easily obtained from essay-based subjects such as History. Maths not being compulsory does not necessarily make students less ready for their careers and other future life scenarios.
Many cognitive benefits and skills learnt are not exclusive to Maths
Non-transferable skills - Maths’ somewhat universal need can be contested with some of its non-transferable skills. For those students who are going towards the arts or trying to apply maths in a non-traditional manner (such as personal financing), the maths at school would actually hinder their ability to pursue their areas of interest.
Poor teaching - The country's failure to keep up globally and learn the relevant skills in maths could have more to do with the quality of maths education rather than the teaching of it. Ever since Covid, coupled with a shortage of teachers, maths education before high school has taken a hit. The implications of lower-quality education will cascade up to high school. So, if maths skills need to be further engrained in students, the issues also lie further down the education latter than just past 16.
Summary
Conclusion: Maths has many benefits, and allowing all students to keep in touch with it throughout high school is not necessarily a bad idea. Yet, believing that the only way to alleviate Britain’s low competitiveness and that maths is the ultimate universal skill would misrepresent the actual merits of other subjects. The same logical thinking and mathematical skills could still be learned through other means and subjects. Plus, maths education does not teach all types of maths necessary for all industries and personal circumstances. If the UK seeks to make maths compulsory, it should also consider the quality and relevance of that maths education.
What do you think?
Is maths the only essential subject in high school?
How can maths be better thought?
Does compulsory math infringe on students’ freedom?
To Vote, Comment, or Leave Feedback, Visit Our Instagram
This newsletter was brought to you by writers: Gaby Miller
Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.
Feedback
If you have have any questions or feedback, feel free to reach out to us directly on any of our social media, or at [email protected]
Reply