Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?

UK Budget 2024 💷📈 | 2024 Tree of the Year 🌳🏆 | US Election 🗳️🇺🇸

Welcome to today’s issue of The Debate Daily!

In today’s email: Recent proposals by the Labour government to ban smoking in many outdoor public places such as pub gardens have prompted significant debate about whether bans are the right way to address public health challenges. Some would say that indoor bans have gone far enough and that to curb people’s freedom any more would be an unnecessary intervention by a nanny state. However, it could also be argued that with smoking still causing a huge number of deaths in the UK each year, any measure to discourage tobacco use is a step in the right direction for public health. The key question is whether the health benefits can justify the restriction on liberty and potential harm to businesses.

By Isaac Crawford

The Headlines

Rachel Reeves outside 11 Downing Street

  • UK Budget 2024: Chancellor Rachel Reeves unveils Labour’s first Budget since 2010, with £40bn in tax hikes to fund the NHS and public services.

  • US Election: With six days until the 2024 election, more than 57.5m people have voted so far, according to the Election Lab at the University of Florida

  • 2024 Tree of the Year: The 400-year-old Skippinish Oak in Scotland wins, securing 21% of the vote over the Darwin Oak and Lincolnshire’s Bowthorpe Oak.

Debate #035

Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?

Keir Starmer’s recent confirmation of the government’s desire to ban smoking outside pubs and other public places is designed to reduce the habit in public. This could help curb a dangerous and often lethal habit in environments where both smokers and non-smokers are negatively affected by cigarettes’ harmful chemicals.

Curbing a Killer - Smoking is inherently lethal, killing 6 million people per year according to Tobacco Control. The huge number of smoking-related deaths worldwide suggests that it is too destructive to be left as a matter of free choice and even in a country like the UK with relatively low smoking rates, should be reduced as much as possible. Public health experts have supported the Labour proposals as a positive step towards better public health, suggesting that the plan will be effective.

The Damage Done - Smoking is damaging to both the public environment and the the natural environment. The UK has already banned the practice in all enclosed workspaces, public buildings and transport in England and Scotland, indicating the damage it can do not just to those who smoke but to those around them, as passive smoking is a well-known contributor to the same damaging effects suffered by those who smoke. Furthermore, both the production and use of cigarettes is bad for the environment for a variety of reasons, meaning even stronger discouragement of tobacco use can only be a good thing.

Public health experts have supported the Labour proposals as a positive step towards better public health

Minor Impact on Business - Public smoking is not a necessary part of commercial success. The Department of Health reported that 81% of companies consider ‘smoke-free’ legislation a good idea, with 40% recording a positive impact compared to just 3% who reported a negative one. As for pubs, some have banned the practice since as early as 1994. Yougov polling suggests that smoking bans in the UK are supported by a majority (51%) with only 24% who would “strongly oppose” it, indicating more support for smoke free pub gardens than opposition.

Enjoying The Debate Daily?

Click to Share!

However…

Bans on smoking in public can be seen as a step too far. They may even fail to improve public health so the restrictions on freedom that they entail are simply not justifiable.

An Unnecessary Step - The Annual Population Survey has recorded an 8-point percentage decline in adult smokers since 2011, down to 11.9% from 12.9% between 2022 and 23. A consistent decrease in usage fits the government goal of a virtually smoke-free England by 2030, as a projected 95% or more of the adult population will not smoke. A public ban does not make much sense given that the public is abandoning the practice anyway. 

The Young Don’t Smoke - The smoking rate for 18-24-year-olds declined more than any other age group to 9.8% in 2023, down from 25.7% in 2011. This represents a major shift, given that the 2011 figure was above the national average and the 2023 percentage is below it. This shows that smoking is no longer a popular practice amongst young people, indicating that it will be even less of a problem as future generations come through. Despite its notoriously addictive nature, the future of smoking is one of natural decline so a ban would have little impact.

A public ban does not make much sense given that the public is abandoning the practice anyway

Health is not the Issue - Banning smoking in outdoor areas of pubs reduces the number of safe smoking spaces. The NHS recommends outdoor smoking in every case compared to indoor smoking to limit its negative effects on non-smokers. Removing smoking areas, besides being unnecessary in reducing tobacco use, would remove a common social setting for smokers to enjoy without significantly improving public health. Additionally, the UK has extensive restrictions on smoking in areas that could threaten vulnerable people, raising the question of whether outright public bans, especially in pubs, are necessary.

Summary

Although government plans to introduce a smoking ban on a number of outdoor places like pub gardens and outside hospitals have stalled recently, Labour’s commitment to the idea has sparked debate about where to draw the line in terms of people’s freedom to smoke. Some see a potential ban as an unacceptable curbing of individual liberty, particularly with strict rules already in place. They also point to the economic consequences, arguing that pubs rely heavily on the custom of smokers and that a ban may force closures in what is already a struggling sector. Finally, it could be argued that most of the public health benefit was achieved in banning indoor smoking and that an outdoor ban would gain relatively little in comparison. However, the dire health consequences of smoking cannot be ignored - tobacco use is still a massive killer even in a country like the UK with a relatively low smoking rate. It can therefore be argued that any measure to discourage the use of such deadly products is a step in the right direction, regardless of whether it restricts freedom. Ultimately, it is a case of weighing up how much we value people’s freedom to smoke versus protecting them from the health consequences smoking entails.

What do you think?

  1. Is the relatively low smoking rate in the UK partly the result of the emergence of vaping and what, if anything, should be done to tackle vaping?

  2. Many lifestyle choices other than smoking also have an impact on how long people live so where do we draw the line between things we should address and things we shouldn’t?

  3. How would pub-going smokers respond to the ban and would it really threaten pubs’ survival?

To Vote, Comment, or Leave Feedback, Visit Our Instagram

What On Earth Is Going On

Effects of Israel Banning UNRWA

The Israeli state recently banned the UN aid and relief agency operating in Israel. Such an event follows after weeks of incidents between the Israeli military and UN forces in the region.

What does this mean:

Israel seems to move further ahead in its military operations in Lebanon and Gaza without taking in comments from the international community.

This newsletter was brought to you by writers: Kierat Basi, Ozan Selcuk and Kit Swift

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.

Feedback

If you have have any questions or feedback, feel free to reach out to us directly on any of our social media, or at [email protected]

Reply

or to participate.