- The Debate Daily
- Posts
- Should the UK Legalise Assisted Dying?
Should the UK Legalise Assisted Dying?
Drug-poisoning deaths 💊📈 | Early release of criminals 🚓 | Brain processing speed 🧠⚡
Welcome to today’s issue of The Debate Daily!
In today’s email: We will look at the question of the legalisation of assisted death in the UK. Assisted dying involves a physician deliberately prescribing end-of-life medication and means to a terminally ill patient. Some argue that the legalisation of assisted death gives the terminally ill patient a ‘choice’ to have a dignified death on their terms. However, others argue that legalisation may induce a slippery slope to broader distrust in the healthcare system and negatively alter social attitudes toward the terminally ill.
By Ellen Revell
The Headlines
Drug-poisoning deaths: Drug deaths in England and Wales have hit a 30-year high, with a 30% rise in fatalities involving cocaine. Men aged 40-49 from "Generation X" are the most affected, according to the ONS.
Early release of criminals: Over 1,000 serious criminals were released early to ease overcrowding in UK prisons. Among them, a man claiming to be from the Kuwaiti royal family left in a £250,000 Lamborghini.
Brain processing speed: A new study shows the human brain can process sentences almost instantly, challenging previous theories that words are understood one by one.
Debate #32
Should the UK Legalise Assisted Dying?
Some argue that the legalisation of assisted dying encourages one's right to autonomy and offers an opportunity to avoid immense pain and loss of dignity from prolonging their life.
More Dangerous Not to Legalise It - Not legalising assisted dying risks further secrecy of patients travelling to centres such as Dignitas to access the treatment. The journey can be extremely tough for someone already suffering from a terminal illness. In some cases, this has meant that some patients seek assisted dying earlier, further shortening their time left with friends and family. The patient’s family is also put at risk of prosecution due to the current UK laws on assisted suicide. Additionally, the journey can cost up to £10,000, further discriminating against poorer patients.
Lesser Evil - Assisted dying offers patients a painless and dignified death, this can be considered as a compassionate act compared to a slow and sometimes painful death in palliative care. The voluntary element means that the patients can feel reassured, knowing they have control over a seemingly helpless situation. Patients who have advocated for assisted dying, such as Paolo Marra and Sophia Blake, have said that it's about “reclaiming control” and leaving your family with good memories.
Assisted suicide offer patients a painless and dignified death…
Widespread Public Support - Recent civil jury results have shown support for allowing assisted dying for the terminally ill. Similarly, a recent petition created by the Daily Express called ‘Give us our last rights’ has had over 200,000 signatures, further promoting a debate in parliament. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has promised a free vote in parliament on assisted dying at some point in the current term to re-ignite the debate on assisted dying.
However…
However, assisted dying raises ethical concerns, as it may contradict the Hippocratic Oath, which entails doctors swearing to uphold ethical standards to treat patients. It may also lead to potential risks of abuse, coercion, and manipulation. Furthermore, the British healthcare infrastructure may be unable to provide effective safeguarding.
Failed Attempts- Over the past ten years, there have been multiple failed attempts of private members bills in the House of Commons and Lords, which sought to legalise assisted suicide. This proves that there are still major concerns in the debate. The British Medical Association (BMA) has also become neutral on the subject. Most notably, they found that 54% of doctors would be unwilling to participate in the process of assisted death.
A New Social Attitude - Legalising assisted dying could negatively alter society's attitude toward terminal illness, ageing and the medical system. Patients may feel like a burden and may be more likely to choose assisted dying much earlier than necessary. Additionally, it could devalue and produce less trust in the medical system regarding patient care. Disability rights advocates also argued that it devalues disabled people’s lives and that assisted dying would result in a ‘loss of dignity’ by not being given a fighting chance.
Legalising assisted dying could negatively alter society's attitude toward terminal illness
Slippery Slope - There are risks of patients being abused and forced into dying for monetary gain. It would therefore be difficult for the medical system to ensure that the right safeguarding is in place effectively. Additionally, qualifying to deem a patient’s life eligible for death is still a grey area. Although, it's argued to be the patient's choice, it's essentially the doctor's decision on determining whether they can die.
Summary
The issue of assisted death is a sensitive topic to a lot of people, especially those who either suffer from terminal illnesses or care for one. Making decisions on such matters can often be distressing for the terminally ill and their families. The choice of assisted dying can be considered a human right for those going through terminal illness. It offers them a peaceful and painless death on their terms, further taking back control. At the end of the day, it is the terminally ill patient who is suffering the most. However, the other side also offers a sensible rebuttal given the risk of social attitudes that may force the terminally ill to ‘ought’ to consider assisted death upon diagnosis, which may bring further distress to the patient and the families. It is also most tricky to determine this: how far can we go to deem a patient’s life eligible for death without hurting their dignity?
What do you think?
Will the UK legalise it within the next five years?
What could the criteria be to make one eligible for assisted death?
How could one tackle the possible corruption and monetary greed in assisted death if legalised?
What’s on earth is going on?
Labour Interfering in US Elections?
The US Republican Campaign has officially filed a complaint to the Federal Electoral Commission, accusing the Labour Party of interfering in US elections. This interference comes in the form of supporting the Harris campaign with primarily Labour personnel.
On the one hand, the Labour Party rejects this accusation. Keir Starmer stated that the Labour Party is not involved in funding any of its members to support the Harris Campaign. The members present are volunteers, going on their own accord, making their work perfectly legal.
On the other hand, the accusation has some legitimate claims. The complaint states evidence from key Labour Party officials offering housing to volunteering Labour members and other financial contributions. Yet there is no evidence of actual financial transactions between the Labour Party and the Democrats.
What does this mean:
This complaint is significant because it maintains Keir Starmer’s relationship with Trump. If the Republicans win the elections, the accusation will taint Keir Starmer’s ability to cooperate with the US.
Foreign interference is also a substantive accusation in politics. The phrase signifies an attack on the US's authority to run its elections fairly, sort of similar to how Russia interferes in European elections for populist parties.
This newsletter was brought to you by Ellen Revell and Ozan Selcuk
Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.
Feedback
If you have have any questions or feedback, feel free to reach out to us directly on any of our social media, or at [email protected]
Reply