Should Voting in Elections Be Mandatory?

Germany-Finland Cable Severed 🌊 | Russia Warns Over US Missiles 🚀 | Farmers Protest in Westminster 🚜

Welcome to today’s issue of The Debate Daily!

In today’s email: Recent elections in the UK and the US have had poor levels of turnout, begging the question of whether making voting mandatory would improve the democratic process. Arguably, it would ensure the views of the whole country would be properly represented, including those with more moderate views, and give those elected greater legitimacy. However, there are important questions to be raised about whether it would amount to an unacceptable curbing of freedom and prevent people from making the legitimate political statement that is not voting. This may lead to uninformed voting and even more disillusionment with the system. Would compulsory voting really strengthen democracy?

By Grace Leather

The Headlines

  • Germany-Finland Cable Severed: An undersea telecommunications cable linking Germany and Finland has been severed. Investigations are ongoing amid heightened tensions with Russia.

  • Russia Warns Over US Long-Range Missiles in Ukraine: Russia states it will respond "appropriately" if Ukraine uses US long-range missiles against Russian territory, calling it a direct US involvement in hostilities.

  • Farmers to Protest in Westminster: UK farmers, joined by Jeremy Clarkson, are set to protest inheritance tax reforms, marking the largest demonstration against the government since Labour's election victory.

Debate #046

Should Voting in Elections Be Mandatory?

Political participation is regarded by many as a civic duty. However, around 40% of the UK’s electorate did not vote in the 2024 general election. Introducing mandatory voting would ensure greater representation, less polarisation in political views and enhanced democratic legitimacy for those elected.

Representation - Compulsory voting in elections allows for a complete representation of a country’s views. Generally, election turnout is lowest amongst the working classes, younger generations and ethnic minorities. This can lead to the election of politicians who may not completely represent the population's views. In the last UK general election, fewer than half of 18-24-year-olds exercised their right to vote, whereas three-quarters of those aged 65+ voted, leading to a huge imbalance in views represented.

âťť

Introducing compulsory voting would mitigate the right versus left polarisation that exists in many countries

Less Polarisation - Those with stronger views are most likely to vote in elections so in turn, extreme views are more likely to be heard and represented. However, 26% of the UK electorate have no political affiliation and are amongst one of the hardest groups to encourage to participate. Nevertheless, these voters are essential to democracy because they provide a more centrist perspective. In this way, introducing compulsory voting would mitigate the right versus left polarisation that exists in many countries.

Enhanced Democratic Legitimacy - The legitimacy of governments elected via compulsory voting is higher due to the inevitable higher voter turnout. Australia has been using mandatory voting for over a century and averages a 94% voter turnout. In comparison, in 2024, the UK had a 60% turnout and the US had a 64% turnout. Countries with lower turnout and close election results often face the lingering question of what might have happened if more people voted, such as if more young people had voted in the UK’s Brexit referendum. Australia, on the other hand, garners results with almost complete legitimacy because of compulsory voting.

Enjoying The Debate Daily?

Click to Share!

However…

Although compulsory voting seems attractive in theory, it has many issues such as the restriction of people’s freedom to choose not to vote, an increase in uneducated and random voting and the use of unjust punishments.

Freedom Not to Vote - People choose not to vote for a variety of reasons, such as distrust of politicians and the political system. Therefore, they should be able to exercise their freedom to make this choice. In March 2024, research found that 63% of the UK electorate had little to no confidence that they have a genuine say in elections, meaning that when the electorate refuses to vote, it shows politicians that they need to gain voter trust and confidence. Compulsory voting would remove people’s ability to make a political statement by not voting, denying them the opportunity to express a legitimate view.

âťť

Compulsory voting would remove people’s ability to make a political statement by not voting, denying them the opportunity to express a legitimate view

Uneducated and Uninformed Voting - Studies have found that 44% of people in the UK have little to no confidence in their ability to participate in politics. This is often due to a lack of political education. Making voting compulsory in places where there is inadequate political education could lead to uninformed, random voting. Research has found that in Brazil, where compulsory voting is in place, 13.4% of the electorate admitted to voting randomly. Compulsory voting could lead to outcomes made by random decision-making, which is not a good thing for democracy.

Unjust Punishments - To uphold compulsory voting, often a punishment is in place. In Australia, this is a $20 fine and in Greece, you can even be imprisoned for not voting. A system that punishes people for not voting seems to infringe too much on people’s right to freedom of choice and arguably fails to uphold political liberty and the idea that participation is voluntary. Forcing people to vote and enforcing this through punishments will cause groups to become further disillusioned with the system, rather than encouraging them to participate.

Summary

Poor turnout in many democratic elections has raised the question of whether introducing Australian-style compulsory voting would be a good thing for democracy. There are obvious theoretical benefits to such a move. Since certain groups are currently more likely to vote than others, compulsory voting would remove the bias that this introduces. Furthermore, it would reduce political polarisation by ensuring people with more moderate views who are less likely to vote than those with extreme views had their voices heard. This extra participation would also lend the election result significant legitimacy and politicians would have a much stronger mandate to introduce their policies because of the greater support they would command. However, there are obvious issues with compulsory voting such as the restriction on freedom that it entails, particularly when it comes to removing the right not to vote, which in many cases is a completely legitimate political statement. There are also concerns that it may lead to uninformed voting and that it could increase disillusionment with the system by enforcing voting through punishments, something that is arguably incompatible with political liberty. Overall, democratic countries need to strike a balance between some liberty and some restrictions on liberty. The key question is whether the restriction that compulsory voting entails can justify the benefits that it also entails. Does it?

What do you think?

  1. Since you are still allowed to spoil your ballot when there is compulsory voting, wouldn’t this actually make it easier to assess political disillusionment?

  2. To what extent are voters actually informed and how informed do they need to be for the democratic process to work?

  3. Are the people who don’t vote significantly different enough to those who do for compulsory voting to lead to different election outcomes? If they were, wouldn’t they be more motivated to vote?

To Vote, Comment, or Leave Feedback, Visit Our Instagram

This newsletter was brought to you by writer Grace Leather and editor Kit Swift

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.

Feedback

If you have have any questions or feedback, feel free to reach out to us directly on any of our social media, or at [email protected]

Reply

or to participate.