Friday Roundup

In this article: As Russia’s war with Ukraine continues to rumble on, Putin has demonstrated his preparedness to fight an attritional conflict, something that favours the superior numbers and military might of Russia. However, with the even greater power of NATO siding with Ukraine, there are strong reasons for them to increase their involvement to protect global stability and stem the damage being done by Russia. Nevertheless, there is a significant chance of increased NATO involvement resulting in catastrophic consequences for the prospect of peace, leading many to see the risk of nuclear conflict as too great. Would greater NATO involvement really improve the situation?

By Tommy King

In this article: Recent elections in the UK and the US have had poor levels of turnout, begging the question of whether making voting mandatory would improve the democratic process. Arguably, it would ensure the views of the whole country would be properly represented, including those with more moderate views, and give those elected greater legitimacy. However, there are important questions to be raised about whether it would amount to an unacceptable curbing of freedom and prevent people from making the legitimate political statement that is not voting. This may lead to uninformed voting and even more disillusionment with the system. Would compulsory voting really strengthen democracy?

By Grace Leather

In this article: China dominates many discussions around foreign affairs globally, particularly in the West. It is the second largest economy and military spender, with the second largest population. When combined with the contradiction between many Western nations’ vision of democratic rule and China’s autocratic system, it’s easy to see how some people think China’s power threatens the West. However, China’s economic and production strengths arguably incentivise harmonious relationships for mutual economic and political development through trade and diplomacy. Should China be perceived as a threat or a country that we can work with for the better?

By Ben Chambers

In this article: There is increasing debate over the role of monarchical influence over political life in many constitutional monarchies. In the case of Australia, the debate over becoming a republic has intensified with King Charles III and Queen Camilla’s October 2024 visit serving as a reminder of the influence that Britain’s monarchy still has. Supporters argue a republic would ensure an Australian head of state and strengthen national identity. Opponents contend that the monarchy brings stability and historical continuity. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese supports a republic but others believe the country needs further dialogue and consensus before pursuing constitutional change. Is now the right time? 

By Jennifer Bailey